Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Prohibits federal agencies from using taxpayer money to promote themselves or their officials.
The problem
Federal agencies may spend public funds on advertising, communications, or activities that benefit the agency or its leadership rather than serve the public interest.
The proposal
The bill restricts federal agencies from using appropriated funds for self-promotional materials, advertising, or communications that primarily benefit the agency or officials rather than inform the public about services.
The impact
Federal agencies, taxpayers, and the public are affected. Agencies must limit promotional spending; taxpayers may see reduced government advertising; public access to government information could change.
Reduces government spending on self-promotion and advertising. Taxpayer dollars focus on actual services instead of promotional activities. Could decrease overall federal spending.
Creates clearer rules about what public money can be used for. Makes it harder for agencies or officials to misuse funds for personal benefit. Improves oversight of federal spending.
Prevents agencies from using taxpayer funds for activities that favor certain officials or political goals. Limits ability to use government resources for partisan purposes.
Encourages agencies to spend money on actual public services rather than promoting themselves. Shifts priorities toward delivering benefits to citizens.
May restrict agencies from communicating important public health, safety, or service information to citizens. Could reduce ability to inform people about available benefits or programs they qualify for.
The bill may not clearly define what counts as self-promotion versus legitimate public communication. Could create confusion about what agencies can legally do or lead to legal disputes.
Agencies may struggle to comply without clear guidelines. Could require new bureaucratic processes to determine what spending is allowed, potentially creating delays in agency operations.
Agencies might communicate less with the public to avoid legal risk. Citizens could have harder time understanding government services and programs available to them.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.