Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows the Defense Production Act to use specialized staffing for government operations.
The problem
Government agencies may lack flexibility in hiring specialized personnel quickly under existing staffing rules and procedures.
The proposal
Modifies Defense Production Act authority to permit specialized staffing arrangements for government operations and related activities.
The impact
Government agencies gain hiring flexibility; staffing costs may increase; affected workers and agencies experience procedural changes.
Allows government to quickly bring in specialized workers during crises or urgent situations. This could speed up responses to national emergencies or complex problems that need expert help.
Enables agencies to hire experts from private sector who have skills not available in regular government workforce. Brings in fresh talent and specialized knowledge when needed most.
Reduces red tape in hiring process for specific government needs. Agencies can fill gaps in expertise without lengthy traditional hiring procedures.
Specialized staffing typically costs more than regular government employees. Budget impacts could be significant depending on how often this authority is used.
May reduce opportunities for regular civil service hiring and promotion. Could weaken protections and merit-based hiring that normally apply to government jobs.
Limited details available on how agencies must report or account for specialized staffing use. Could reduce transparency and government accountability.
Expanded staffing authority could be used beyond legitimate emergency purposes. May create inconsistent hiring standards across different agencies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.