Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires federal agencies to account for and report on unfunded mandates imposed on states and localities.
The problem
Federal laws often require states and local governments to spend money without providing federal funding. These unfunded mandates strain state and local budgets without transparency about costs.
The proposal
Bill mandates federal agencies analyze, estimate costs of, and publicly report on unfunded mandates before implementing rules affecting state and local governments.
The impact
States, cities, and counties would gain transparency about federal mandate costs. Federal agencies must assess financial impacts before issuing new regulations.
States and cities could plan budgets more accurately by understanding true costs of federal requirements. This transparency helps local officials make informed decisions about resources and priorities.
Local governments would know upfront what federal mandates cost instead of discovering expenses later. This prevents financial crises caused by unexpected federal requirements.
Federal agencies would justify mandate costs before implementation rather than imposing them unilaterally. This creates checks on federal power and encourages cost-benefit analysis.
Public reporting allows states and communities to voice concerns about mandate costs before rules take effect. This strengthens feedback between government levels.
Required cost analysis and reporting could slow federal rulemaking on important issues like safety, environment, and health. Delays might prevent timely responses to public needs.
Federal agencies face new requirements to analyze and document mandate costs, adding administrative work and expenses. This bureaucratic requirement itself costs money.
The bill could limit federal government ability to enforce national standards across states. This might weaken federal oversight of health, safety, and civil rights issues.
Bill language about what counts as an unfunded mandate may be unclear, creating legal disputes. Courts might struggle interpreting mandate scope and cost thresholds.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.