Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to improve home rule governance and local authority in Washington, D.C.
The problem
D.C. residents have limited self-governance compared to state residents. Congress maintains significant control over D.C.'s local budget and laws despite D.C. having a population larger than several states.
The proposal
Expands D.C.'s home rule powers to give the city greater control over its own government, budgets, and local laws while maintaining federal oversight of certain matters.
The impact
D.C. residents gain more say in local governance. Congress retains less control over D.C. affairs. Federal government adjusts oversight role. D.C. government gains new responsibilities.
D.C. residents would have more power to make decisions about their own city. This gives citizens more influence over local laws and budgets that directly affect their daily lives.
D.C. residents would have similar self-governing powers as people in states. This addresses the argument that D.C. residents pay taxes but have less control than citizens elsewhere.
D.C. government could approve its own budget and laws without waiting for Congress approval. This could speed up how quickly the city addresses local problems.
D.C. leaders would have more power to represent what residents actually want. Local officials would answer directly to D.C. voters rather than Congress.
Congress would have less ability to review D.C. decisions. Some argue Congress needs oversight power since D.C. is the nation's capital and affects the entire country.
The bill summary is not available, so the specific changes to home rule powers are unclear. This makes it hard to predict exact effects on D.C. residents and the federal government.
If D.C. gains full budget control, it might make spending decisions Congress believes are unwise. There could be disagreements about how federal property and interests in D.C. are handled.
The Constitution gives Congress special authority over D.C. Any major change to that power structure might face legal challenges or debate about proper government structure.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10
Reserved for the Speaker.
HR 2
Reserved for the Speaker.
HRES 1530
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9576) to establish the National Fraud Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 10326) to enhance information-sharing capabilities between Federal law enforcement and State agencies to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraud in certain Federal programs, and to protect individual privacy; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 210) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 213) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision''; and providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5334) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.
HR 10204
Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.