Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (text: CR S1616)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve mental health care access and support for doctors treating mental illness.
The problem
Many Americans struggle to find mental health services. There are not enough mental health providers. People face long wait times and high costs for care.
The proposal
The bill likely aims to increase mental health provider numbers, improve insurance coverage for mental health services, and provide financial support to mental health professionals.
The impact
Mental health patients would gain better access to care. Mental health doctors and therapists would receive support. Insurance companies and taxpayers would face new costs.
More people could get mental health treatment when they need it. Long wait times would decrease. People in rural areas might finally have local mental health services.
Mental health providers would receive funding to expand services. This could attract more people to become mental health professionals. Working conditions might improve for existing providers.
People with depression, anxiety, and other conditions could get help faster. Early treatment could prevent serious crises. Communities would be healthier overall.
Treating mental health early costs less than emergency care. People would miss fewer work days. Productivity could increase across the economy.
Taxpayers would pay for new mental health programs. The federal budget would face higher costs. Money might be needed from other programs.
Health insurance companies might raise premiums to cover mental health services. Workers and employers could face higher insurance bills. Some people might drop coverage.
Training enough new mental health providers takes time. Rural areas might still lack services. Money might not reach all communities equally.
Without seeing the full bill text, it is unclear if these measures will actually work. The bill might not address the real reasons for the shortage of providers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.