Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a dedicated reserve fund for the United States Secret Service operations.
The problem
The Secret Service may need financial flexibility to handle unexpected operational costs, security threats, or staffing changes without waiting for regular budget appropriations.
The proposal
Establishes a reserve fund that allows the Secret Service to set aside money for future expenses and access funds when needed without going through standard budget approval processes.
The impact
Affects Secret Service operations, federal budgeting practices, and taxpayers who fund the agency. Changes how the agency manages money and plans for security needs.
The Secret Service could respond quickly to sudden security threats or unexpected costs without waiting for Congress to approve emergency funding. This could improve protection for presidents and other officials.
A reserve fund helps the agency plan ahead and manage money more smoothly throughout the year. It reduces pressure from sudden financial surprises.
The agency can handle minor expenses and adjustments without requesting special approvals from Congress each time, making operations more efficient.
A reserve fund could reduce Congress's ability to review how the Secret Service spends taxpayer money. This weakens the system of checks and balances on government spending.
Without regular scrutiny, the agency might accumulate unused funds or spend money inefficiently. Reserve funds sometimes encourage wasteful spending habits.
The bill summary provided very limited information about the fund's size, rules, or oversight mechanisms, making it hard to evaluate whether it's reasonable.
It's unclear whether the Secret Service currently lacks funding flexibility or if this fund addresses a real problem versus creating unnecessary bureaucracy.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.