Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Education and Workforce, and in addition to the Committee on the Budget, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Eliminates student loan interest and increases borrowing limits for college students.
The problem
Student loan debt costs borrowers money through interest charges. Many students struggle with high total loan amounts and cannot borrow enough for education costs.
The proposal
Removes interest from student loans. Creates a fund to support education affordability. Raises yearly and total borrowing limits students can access.
The impact
College students benefit from lower loan costs. Taxpayers fund the program. Federal budget spending increases significantly.
Students pay back only what they borrowed, not additional interest charges. This saves borrowers thousands of dollars over their repayment period.
Higher borrowing limits help students from low-income families afford college without working as many hours. More people could complete degrees.
College graduates earn more and pay more taxes. Lower debt payments free up money for graduates to buy homes and start businesses.
Without interest calculations, loans are easier to understand and manage. Students know exactly what they owe.
Eliminating interest means the government loses revenue or must spend more money. Taxpayers ultimately pay through taxes or reduced services elsewhere.
If students can borrow more easily without interest, colleges might raise tuition knowing students can borrow more. Schools have less reason to control costs.
Students who borrow more money—often those attending expensive schools—save more interest. This may help wealthier students more than poorest students.
The program requires new government spending without clear funding sources. This adds to the national debt unless taxes increase or other programs are cut.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.