Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Joni Ernst (R-IA)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill authorizes spending on an unspecified government program or project.
The problem
No official summary provided. Bill title suggests concerns about inefficient government spending or wasteful programs requiring legislative review.
The proposal
Bill S 766 appears to allocate federal funds for a government initiative, though specific details are unavailable in current public records.
The impact
Taxpayers, federal agencies, and program beneficiaries would be affected depending on the bill's actual provisions and funding amounts.
Government spending can create jobs in construction, administration, or related sectors. This could help local economies and reduce unemployment in affected areas.
If funds support infrastructure or services, communities may benefit from improved facilities or expanded programs.
The bill has undergone committee hearings, allowing for public scrutiny and debate about government spending priorities.
Without official details, the bill's actual purpose and effectiveness are unknown. This makes it difficult to evaluate whether spending is justified.
The bill's title suggests concerns about inefficiency. Taxpayer money could be spent on ineffective programs without clear measurable outcomes.
No summary or subject information is available, making it hard for citizens to understand what their tax dollars support.
Without spending details, the effect on federal deficits and future budgets cannot be assessed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.