Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Repeal the executive order that created a national framework for artificial intelligence policy.
The problem
An executive order established a national policy framework for artificial intelligence. Some believe this framework overreaches executive authority or creates unnecessary regulations.
The proposal
Remove the executive order titled 'Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence' and eliminate the policy framework it created.
The impact
AI companies, researchers, government agencies, and the public would be affected by changing how AI is regulated and overseen at the federal level.
Repealing the order could reduce rules that AI companies and researchers must follow. This might allow faster innovation and development of new AI technologies without government oversight.
Without the framework, companies may develop AI products more quickly. Fewer requirements could help American companies compete globally in AI technology.
Repealing an executive order checks the power of the President. This returns decision-making to Congress, which some view as more democratic.
The framework included protections against AI risks like bias and misuse. Repealing it could leave the public vulnerable to harmful AI applications without guardrails.
Removing federal guidance leaves unclear rules for AI development. Companies may lack direction on safety standards, leading to inconsistent practices across industries.
Congress would need to write new AI laws to replace the framework. This process takes time, leaving a period with minimal AI oversight.
Without AI oversight, companies might use AI to replace workers without safeguards. The framework had protections for worker impacts that would be removed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.