Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 465.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to eliminate local policies that limit immigration enforcement cooperation.
The problem
Some cities and states have policies restricting local police from helping federal immigration authorities. Supporters say this hampers enforcement; critics say it protects residents.
The proposal
Bill would prohibit jurisdictions from adopting policies that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement agencies.
The impact
Affects local governments, immigrants, police departments, and communities with sanctuary policies. Changes how local law enforcement interacts with immigration authorities.
Creates consistent immigration enforcement across all jurisdictions. All areas would follow the same federal rules. May increase overall enforcement effectiveness.
Strengthens federal control over immigration policy. Prevents local governments from working around federal law. Centralizes decision-making at national level.
Requires local police to help federal immigration agents. Removes barriers between local and federal authorities. May speed up immigration-related cases.
Immigrants may fear reporting crimes to local police. Communities could become less safe as witnesses avoid police. Trust between residents and police could weaken.
Removes city and state power to set their own policies. Local elected officials lose ability to represent their constituents. Centralizes power away from communities.
Local police spend time on immigration enforcement instead of local crimes. Diverts resources from robbery, assault, and other local issues. Police departments may become overwhelmed.
May conflict with states' rights under the Tenth Amendment. Questions whether federal government can force local enforcement. Could face legal challenges.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.