Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 469.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
John Barrasso (R-WY)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill aims to improve safety measures and emergency response systems in national parks.
The problem
National parks may lack adequate safety infrastructure, emergency response capabilities, or security measures to protect visitors and staff.
The proposal
The bill would establish or enhance safety protocols, emergency services, and security measures across the national park system.
The impact
Visitors, park staff, and local communities near national parks would experience improved emergency response and safety conditions.
Improved safety measures could help park rangers respond faster to accidents, injuries, and emergencies. This could save lives and reduce serious injuries for the millions of visitors who use national parks annually.
Enhanced safety infrastructure might encourage more people to visit national parks. Higher visitor numbers could boost local tourism economies and businesses near park entrances.
Park staff would benefit from better safety equipment and protocols. This protects rangers and employees who work in remote and sometimes dangerous environments.
National standards could ensure all parks meet consistent safety requirements. This prevents gaps where some parks have better safety measures than others.
New safety infrastructure and programs would require federal funding. This adds to the national budget and may divert money from other government priorities.
Parks vary widely in size, location, and resources. A one-size-fits-all approach might not work well for all parks and could waste money on unnecessary measures.
Expanded safety measures could include surveillance or restrictions on park access. This might affect visitor privacy or limit people's outdoor experiences in natural spaces.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly what safety measures are proposed. The bill could include costly or controversial requirements not yet disclosed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.