Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to prioritize value and results in government spending decisions.
The problem
Government agencies may spend money without clearly measuring whether programs work well or deliver good results for taxpayers.
The proposal
Requires federal agencies to evaluate programs based on value and outcomes rather than just costs when making spending decisions.
The impact
Affects federal agencies, taxpayers, and program beneficiaries by potentially changing how government decides which programs to fund.
Agencies would focus on programs that actually work and deliver results. This could reduce waste and make government spending more efficient. Taxpayers might see better services from their money.
Government would measure whether programs succeed using clear standards. This transparency helps public understanding of what federal spending actually accomplishes.
Shifting attention from just cutting costs to measuring results could preserve important programs that work well. Effective programs would be protected even if they cost more.
Defining and measuring 'value' is difficult and subjective. Different people may disagree on what outcomes matter most, making implementation challenging.
If value-based decisions lead to funding programs that cost more, overall government spending could rise. Budget constraints might limit how much this approach helps.
Creating new evaluation systems requires time, money, and training. Agencies would need resources to track and measure program outcomes properly.
The bill provides limited detail on how 'value' should be defined or measured. Agencies might interpret the law differently, creating inconsistency.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.