Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Prevents dead people from receiving federal Lifeline telecommunications subsidies.
The problem
Deceased individuals may continue receiving Lifeline benefits if authorities don't update enrollment records promptly, wasting government funds intended for eligible living citizens.
The proposal
Requires telecommunications providers and regulators to verify that Lifeline subscribers are alive and regularly remove deceased subscribers from the program.
The impact
Lifeline beneficiaries, telecommunications companies, and federal budget are affected. Companies must verify subscribers' status. Dead people lose benefits. Government saves money.
Prevents taxpayer money from going to deceased people who cannot use the service. This targets a clear waste in federal spending and ensures benefits reach intended recipients.
Forces better record-keeping and verification systems across telecommunications providers. Cleaner enrollment lists benefit the entire Lifeline program.
Preventing payments to deceased people is widely popular. Both parties typically support eliminating obvious program waste and fraud.
Strengthens public confidence in Lifeline by showing the government actively prevents misuse of subsidies meant for low-income citizens.
Telecommunications providers must verify subscriber status regularly, adding costs for verification systems and staff time. Small companies may struggle with compliance.
Requires sharing death information between government agencies and private companies. Could create privacy risks or unnecessary data collection.
The bill may be expensive to implement through verification systems, training, and enforcement. Actual savings from preventing fraud might be smaller than compliance costs.
Only removes people from rolls after death rather than preventing initial over-enrollment. Doesn't solve underlying enrollment verification problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.