Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Expands public safety officer benefits program to honor officers John Barnes and Michael Ansbro.
The problem
Public safety officers and their families may lack adequate benefits and recognition following line-of-duty deaths or injuries sustained protecting communities.
The proposal
Expands the Public Safety Officers' Benefits Program, likely increasing benefits, expanding eligibility, or creating new support for officers and families affected by duty-related incidents.
The impact
Public safety officers, their families, and federal/state benefit programs. May increase costs for government while improving support for officers harmed in service.
Expanded benefits provide financial security to families of fallen or injured officers. This recognizes the sacrifice made in public service and helps prevent financial hardship.
Better benefits packages make law enforcement careers more attractive to qualified candidates. This helps departments maintain experienced staff and attract skilled professionals.
Naming the program after specific officers recognizes their contributions and sacrifice. This honors heroes and demonstrates public appreciation for dangerous work.
Standardized benefits ensure officers nationwide receive comparable support regardless of location. This creates equity across different states and departments.
Expanded benefits require additional federal funding. This increases budget costs and may require reallocating money from other programs or raising revenue.
Without specific language, it is unclear exactly what benefits are added or how much expansion occurs. Vague legislation makes budgeting and implementation difficult.
Expansion may not address all categories of public safety workers equally, such as contracted security or emergency medical personnel. Some groups might receive inadequate coverage.
Expanding eligibility and benefits increases paperwork and processing requirements. This creates administrative burden for agencies implementing the program.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.