Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Homeland Security, and in addition to the Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reorganizes threat evaluation programs and changes funding for federal security operations.
The problem
Current threat evaluation and reporting systems may need restructuring to improve efficiency and clarify which federal agencies handle specific security responsibilities.
The proposal
The bill reassigns the National Threat Evaluation and Reporting Program to different agencies and reforms how the program receives and uses federal funding.
The impact
Federal agencies, intelligence officials, and law enforcement personnel involved in threat assessment will experience changes in responsibilities, resources, and reporting procedures.
Reassigning the program may reduce confusion about which agencies are responsible for specific threat evaluations. This could eliminate duplicate work and make coordination between agencies easier.
Reforming funding could redirect resources to where they are most needed. Better fund allocation might improve the program's effectiveness without increasing total spending.
Moving the program to more appropriate agencies could sharpen its mission and performance. The new agencies may have better expertise or resources for the work.
Reassignment provides an opportunity to establish clearer accountability measures. New oversight structures could improve transparency and performance tracking.
Moving a program between agencies creates temporary confusion and inefficiency. Employees may face changes in roles, training delays could occur, and information transfer takes time.
Without details on funding reform, agencies may face budget uncertainty. Some operations could be underfunded during reorganization, potentially weakening threat evaluation capabilities.
Reassigning a program risks losing experienced staff and specialized expertise. New agencies may lack the background needed to run the program effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.