Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to improve government use of satellite and space technology for civilian purposes.
The problem
Federal agencies lack coordinated approaches to using satellite data and space technology. Current systems are fragmented across departments, limiting efficiency and innovation.
The proposal
Establishes a government-wide framework for civilian space technology use. Creates coordination mechanisms between federal agencies for satellite data sharing and space applications.
The impact
Federal agencies gain better tools and coordination. Taxpayers may see improved government services. Private space companies could have new partnership opportunities with government.
Coordinating space technology across agencies could reduce waste and duplication. Federal programs might deliver services faster and cheaper. Agencies can share satellite data instead of each collecting their own.
Private space companies could partner with government on new projects. This could create jobs in the space technology sector. Business partnerships might lower costs through competition.
Satellite data helps with weather forecasting, disaster response, and agriculture monitoring. Better coordination means faster emergency response. Citizens may benefit from improved government services.
Space technology can track climate patterns, natural resources, and environmental changes. Better data helps agencies protect public lands. Coordination improves scientific research capabilities.
Creating new coordination systems requires budget spending. New administrative positions and technology infrastructure have costs. Unclear if benefits justify the expenses.
Sharing satellite data between agencies raises privacy concerns for citizens. Coordination could create new cybersecurity risks. Data protection standards need clear definition.
The bill summary is unavailable, making specific requirements unclear. Agencies may struggle interpreting vague mandates. Implementation could be inconsistent across government.
Heavy government use of space technology might crowd out private industry. Companies could lose business opportunities to government programs. Market competition could decrease.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.