Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects BRIC disaster recovery funding from being redirected or eliminated.
The problem
The BRIC program provides federal funds to help communities prepare for and recover from natural disasters. There may be concerns that this funding could be redirected to other purposes.
The proposal
The bill prevents federal agencies from using BRIC disaster recovery funds for purposes other than building community resilience and disaster mitigation projects.
The impact
State and local governments that rely on BRIC grants for disaster preparation would keep stable access to these funds for emergency management projects.
Guarantees that money designated for disaster preparation stays available for that purpose. Communities can plan long-term projects knowing the funding won't be cut or redirected.
Rural and low-income areas often depend heavily on federal disaster funds. Protecting BRIC ensures these communities can improve their ability to handle emergencies.
State and local officials can make solid plans when they know federal disaster money will remain available. This allows better preparation for hurricanes, floods, and other disasters.
Preventing fund redirection limits the federal government's ability to respond to urgent national priorities. If other emergencies arise, disaster funds cannot be temporarily reallocated.
Dedicating funds to one program might mean higher overall government spending if other emergency needs require separate funding. Flexibility in budgets could save taxpayer money.
Without an official summary, the bill's exact restrictions and exceptions are unclear. This makes it difficult to fully assess potential drawbacks or unintended consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 9394
Civil Preparedness for Agroterrorism Exercise Act of 2026
HR 1342
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
HR 10132
ARTICLE ONE Act
HR 10122
STORM FORTIFIED and Wildfire Prepared Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.