Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S1011)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Transfers California land to Pechanga Band of Indians for tribal trust ownership.
The problem
The Pechanga Band of Indians seeks federal recognition of tribal land ownership through trust status for land in California.
The proposal
The bill transfers specified California land into federal trust for the Pechanga Band of Indians, granting the tribe official ownership and control.
The impact
The Pechanga Band gains land control and sovereignty; California loses some state jurisdiction; neighboring communities may see changes in local governance.
Recognizes and supports Native American self-governance and tribal authority over ancestral lands. Allows the Pechanga Band to manage their territory according to tribal law and traditions.
Enables the tribe to develop businesses and resources on trust land. Can support tribal employment and revenue generation for community services.
Protects tribal lands for cultural practices, language, and heritage. Gives the community control over sacred and historically significant areas.
Trust status protects land from outside claims and provides legal security for the tribe's future. Creates stable foundation for intergenerational land ownership.
California loses jurisdiction and tax revenue from trust lands. State cannot enforce certain laws on the transferred property.
Nearby residents and municipalities may face changed relationships with neighboring lands. Local zoning and planning authority becomes limited.
The bill summary lacks specific information about which lands transfer and their total acreage. Without details, full impacts cannot be assessed.
Federal government takes on trust management responsibilities. Creates ongoing administrative costs and oversight obligations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.