Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Makes it easier to deport immigrants convicted of fraud crimes.
The problem
Some immigrants convicted of fraud remain in the country. Supporters say fraud convictions should lead to deportation more consistently.
The proposal
Changes deportation rules to include more fraud-related crimes as grounds for removal from the United States.
The impact
Immigrants convicted of fraud face increased deportation risk. Immigration courts will process more deportation cases. Families may be separated.
Supporters argue this holds people accountable for breaking fraud laws and protects public resources. It aims to ensure immigration consequences match criminal convictions.
Proponents say removing people convicted of fraud protects government benefits and resources. Fraudsters won't be able to commit further crimes in the country.
The law would create consistent standards for which fraud crimes trigger deportation. This removes uncertainty in how cases are handled.
Deportations can separate spouses, parents, and children who are U.S. citizens or permanent residents. This causes emotional and financial hardship for families.
Critics worry the bill expands deportation for minor fraud convictions. People could face removal for mistakes or low-level offenses.
Deportation prevents people from serving their sentences and reforming in the U.S. It may be harsher than intended punishments for some cases.
More deportation cases require more immigration judges and resources. This increases government spending on enforcement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.