Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D-CA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Fix legal errors in federal procurement law by converting it to official positive law.
The problem
Title 41 of the U.S. Code (federal purchasing rules) contains outdated provisions and legal inconsistencies that create confusion. The law needs to be formally enacted as positive law to clarify its actual requirements.
The proposal
The bill corrects errors and inconsistencies in Title 41, United States Code. It formally enacts the federal procurement law into positive law format to ensure accuracy and remove contradictory language.
The impact
Federal agencies, contractors, and government workers will have clearer procurement rules. Small businesses bidding on government contracts benefit from simplified, consistent requirements.
Fixing errors and inconsistencies means businesses will have one clear set of procurement rules to follow. This reduces confusion and mistakes when bidding on government contracts. Everyone follows the same, accurate standards.
Federal agencies will operate more efficiently with corrected, consistent legal language. Employees will spend less time interpreting confusing or contradictory rules. This saves government time and resources.
Clear, accurate law reduces lawsuits and disputes over procurement requirements. Contractors and government agencies will have fewer disagreements about what the law actually says.
Fixing errors in federal law shows commitment to accuracy and clarity. Citizens and businesses can trust that government rules are legally sound and properly enacted.
Federal agencies must update systems, training, and procedures to reflect corrected rules. This requires spending on staff time and administrative changes across government.
During transition, agencies may experience confusion or slower decision-making while adapting to clarified rules. Some contractors may request extensions on existing contracts during the adjustment period.
Most citizens don't follow procurement law changes. The average person may not see direct benefits from technical improvements to federal contracting rules.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.