Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to stop using warehouses as detention facilities for immigration cases.
The problem
Immigration detention facilities sometimes operate in warehouse settings that may lack proper conditions, services, and oversight for detainees awaiting hearings or deportation.
The proposal
The bill would prohibit using warehouse spaces as immigration detention facilities and likely require alternative detention arrangements that meet specific standards.
The impact
Detainees would move to different facilities. States and agencies managing detention would need new locations. Detention costs may increase. Immigration enforcement operations could face delays.
Warehouse facilities often lack proper ventilation, medical care, and sanitation. Moving detainees to regulated facilities could improve health and safety standards. This protects vulnerable populations including families and children.
Warehouse facilities may operate with less government inspection. Regulated detention centers typically have more oversight, documentation, and inspections. This increases transparency in the immigration system.
Inadequate warehouse conditions have led to lawsuits against the government. Using proper facilities reduces injury claims and legal costs. Taxpayers may save money on settlements.
Proper facilities can provide education, mental health services, and family visitation. Warehouse detention often prevents these services. This supports human dignity during the detention process.
Standard detention facilities cost more to operate than warehouses. Building or leasing appropriate facilities requires significant funding. Taxpayers would bear higher immigration detention costs.
If warehouses close without equal alternative facilities, detention capacity may shrink. This could force releasing detainees before hearing dates. Immigration enforcement operations could slow significantly.
States and counties that house federal detainees would need to find new facilities. This creates administrative costs and challenges for local governments. Jail overcrowding in some areas could worsen.
Unless new alternative facilities meet high standards, simply moving detainees to different warehouses solves nothing. Implementation details and funding determine whether conditions actually improve.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.