Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Amy Klobuchar (D-MN)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Improve safety and security for Congress members, their families, and congressional staff.
The problem
Congress members, their families, and staff face security threats. The bill addresses concerns about protecting these groups from potential dangers and crimes.
The proposal
The bill establishes new safety measures and security protocols for Members of Congress, their immediate families, and congressional staff members.
The impact
Congress members, their families, and staff would receive enhanced security protection. Security agencies would implement new safety procedures and resources.
Congress members and their families face real security threats. Better security measures help keep them safe from potential harm. This protects people who work in public service.
With improved security, Congress members can focus on their jobs without constant fear. Staff can work more effectively when they feel safe. This helps government function better.
Clear security protocols create consistent protections across all congressional offices. Standardized procedures make it easier for security agencies to do their jobs. It removes confusion about who is responsible for what.
Expanding security for Congress members and staff requires spending tax dollars. More security personnel, equipment, and training add up quickly. Taxpayers foot the bill for these increased expenses.
Heavy security can make Congress members less accessible to regular citizens. It creates barriers between elected officials and the people they represent. This might reduce public trust and connection.
Congress members get special security while many ordinary Americans don't. This creates a two-tier system of protection based on job status. It raises fairness questions about who deserves government safety resources.
Enhanced security means more monitoring and tracking of Congress members and their families. Surveillance measures can limit personal privacy. Some may view this as excessive government monitoring.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10
Reserved for the Speaker.
HR 2
Reserved for the Speaker.
HRES 1530
Providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 9576) to establish the National Fraud Enforcement Division of the Department of Justice; providing for consideration of the bill (H.R. 10326) to enhance information-sharing capabilities between Federal law enforcement and State agencies to detect, investigate, and prosecute fraud in certain Federal programs, and to protect individual privacy; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 210) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Ocean-Going Vessels At-Berth; Notice of Decision''; providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 213) providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule issued by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to the ‘‘California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Commercial Harbor Craft Regulations; Notice of Decision''; and providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 5334) to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow early childhood educators to take the educator expense deduction, and for other purposes.
HR 10204
Legislative Branch Agencies Clarification Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.