Latest action: Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Jasmine Crockett (D-TX)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Updates space law in U.S. Code and fixes technical errors in legislation.
The problem
Title 51 of the U.S. Code covering space and aeronautics needs updating to reflect current laws and remove outdated or incorrect language.
The proposal
The bill revises Title 51, United States Code to keep it current and makes technical corrections to improve accuracy throughout the U.S. Code.
The impact
Government agencies, space industry, and lawmakers benefit from clearer, more accurate space law. Citizens gain better understanding of regulations governing space activities.
Updating outdated language makes space laws easier to understand and follow. Clear laws help government agencies and space companies operate more efficiently. This reduces confusion about regulatory requirements.
Correcting mistakes in the U.S. Code prevents legal disputes based on wrong wording. Accurate laws ensure everyone follows the same rules fairly. This strengthens confidence in government regulations.
Clearer laws help space companies plan activities and investments with confidence. Accurate regulations reduce legal uncertainty in the growing space sector. This may encourage innovation and business growth.
Updating the code keeps U.S. space law aligned with modern activities and technology. Current laws are better at addressing today's space challenges. This prevents legal gaps as the industry evolves.
Technical corrections mainly affect lawyers, government officials, and industry experts. Average citizens may not notice any changes to their daily lives. The bill's benefits are mostly administrative rather than broadly beneficial.
Revising complex legal language could accidentally alter meaning or intent. Even small wording changes might have unexpected consequences. Courts might interpret updated language differently than intended.
Congress spends time on technical corrections that could address other priorities. Reviewing and approving code updates requires staff and attention. This diverts resources from potentially more urgent legislation.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.