Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Expands federal benefits for public safety officers killed or injured in the line of duty.
The problem
Public safety officers face significant risks. When officers are killed or injured, families need financial support and benefits to recover and survive.
The proposal
The bill expands the Public Safety Officers' Benefit Program to provide increased or new financial assistance to officers and their families in cases of death or serious injury.
The impact
Public safety officers and their families receive enhanced federal financial protections. Taxpayers fund the expanded program. State and local governments may benefit from reduced benefit burden.
Expanded benefits help families of fallen officers pay bills, mortgages, and children's education. This reduces financial hardship when families lose their primary income earner.
Better benefits packages help recruit and keep qualified police officers and firefighters. Knowing their families are protected may encourage more people to pursue public safety careers.
The federal government shares responsibility for supporting those who protect communities. Expanded benefits acknowledge the sacrifices officers make for public safety.
Federal funding for officer benefits reduces the financial burden on state and local governments. This frees up local resources for other public needs.
Expanding the benefit program increases federal spending. These costs must be paid through taxes or added to the national deficit. The exact cost is unknown without more bill details.
Without an official summary, it is unclear how eligibility will change or which officers qualify. Vague rules could lead to confusion or unfair treatment among applicants.
If state and local governments already provide similar benefits, federal expansion could duplicate coverage. This might waste money or create confusion about which benefit applies.
The bill has no official summary posted. Without clear details, lawmakers and the public cannot fully evaluate whether the expansion is well-designed or necessary.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.