Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Awards the Congressional Gold Medal to Charlie Kirk for his contributions.
The problem
The bill proposes recognizing Charlie Kirk's work and influence through a Congressional Gold Medal, the highest civilian honor Congress can award.
The proposal
Authorizes the striking and presentation of a Congressional Gold Medal to Charlie Kirk in recognition of his contributions and service.
The impact
Affects Charlie Kirk through a symbolic honor. Involves Congress spending time and resources on medal creation and ceremony.
The medal acknowledges Kirk's role in conservative political movements and youth engagement. Supporters view this as appropriate recognition for his influence in American politics.
Congressional Gold Medals are a traditional way to honor citizens. Using established procedures maintains continuity with historical practices.
Medal creation and ceremonies involve relatively small government expenses compared to other legislation. The direct fiscal impact is negligible.
Kirk is a polarizing political figure. Award may be viewed as partisan recognition rather than nonpartisan honor, creating controversy.
Critics may question whether Kirk's work meets traditional standards for the Congressional Gold Medal. Previous recipients often had longer-established legacies.
Time spent on medal legislation diverts Congress from other legislative priorities. Some argue resources should focus on pressing policy issues.
Approving controversial figure medals may encourage numerous similar requests, potentially devaluing the honor through overuse.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.