Latest action: Committee on Indian Affairs. Hearings held.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Ben Luján (D-NM)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Extends deadlines for completing a Native American regional water system project in New Mexico.
The problem
The Aamodt Litigation Settlement requires completion of the Regional Water System by specific dates. These deadlines may need adjustment due to construction delays and project complexities.
The proposal
The bill modifies extension dates in the Aamodt Settlement Act to give more time for finishing the Regional Water System project serving Pueblo tribes.
The impact
Pueblo tribes in New Mexico, federal and state water agencies, and local communities relying on the water system are affected by extended project timelines.
Extending deadlines acknowledges real construction challenges and allows proper completion of water infrastructure. Rushed timelines can lead to poor quality or incomplete systems that fail to serve communities.
The original settlement protects Native American water rights. Reasonable extensions help ensure the project actually delivers promised water supplies to Pueblo tribes rather than failing due to impossible timelines.
Flexible deadlines may reduce project costs by allowing proper planning and procurement. Rushed construction often increases expenses and requires expensive rework.
Extended timelines mean communities continue waiting for reliable water infrastructure. Pueblo tribes and residents needing these water systems face longer periods without full benefits of the settlement.
Moving deadlines may weaken incentives to complete work efficiently. Without firm timelines, projects can experience indefinite delays and cost overruns with limited accountability.
Modifying settlement terms creates potential disputes about what obligations remain binding. This could lead to future litigation and unclear expectations among all parties.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.