Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Stops federal money from funding state firearm ownership databases.
The problem
Some states create databases tracking firearm owners. Federal funding may support these databases. Debate exists over privacy and government tracking of gun owners.
The proposal
Prohibits federal funds from being used to create, maintain, or operate state firearm ownership databases or registries.
The impact
States lose federal funding for database programs. Gun owners may have fewer registration systems. Law enforcement may have less centralized firearm tracking data.
Limits government collection of data on lawful gun owners. Prevents centralized tracking systems that some see as privacy violations. Aligns with concerns about personal data security.
Keeps firearm regulation decisions with states and individuals. Limits federal government's power over state programs. Supports federalism principles.
Addresses worries that databases could be misused for confiscation. Protects against potential government overreach with firearm owner data.
Forces states to fund programs themselves without federal help. May reduce states' ability to maintain registration systems.
Police lose access to firearm ownership data for investigations. May slow response to stolen gun tracking. Complicates crime solving when weapons are involved.
Fewer coordinated databases make it harder to track illegal firearms. May reduce effectiveness of federal-state law enforcement partnerships.
Some argue databases help prevent gun violence and recover stolen weapons. Restricting them may reduce tools for crime prevention.
States must find other funding sources for existing programs. May force cuts to public safety initiatives in some states.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.