Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bans bump stocks, devices that allow semi-automatic rifles to fire like automatic weapons.
The problem
Bump stocks enable semi-automatic firearms to fire rapidly like automatic weapons, raising concerns about mass shooting capabilities and public safety risks.
The proposal
The bill closes regulatory gaps by explicitly prohibiting the manufacture, sale, transfer, and possession of bump stock devices or similar rate-of-fire accelerators.
The impact
Gun owners with bump stocks face restrictions; manufacturers lose market access; law enforcement gains clearer enforcement tools; public safety advocates see reduced rapid-fire weapon availability.
A 2019 ban on bump stocks faced legal challenges over regulatory authority. This legislation clarifies congressional intent through direct statutory language, providing stronger legal footing for enforcement and reducing legal ambiguity.
Bump stocks enable semi-automatic weapons to fire hundreds of rounds per minute, mimicking automatic weapon capabilities. Removing this tool from circulation may reduce casualty rates in mass shooting scenarios.
Manufacturers and retailers gain clear statutory guidelines about prohibited devices. This reduces confusion about legal compliance and simplifies enforcement for federal agencies and law enforcement.
Bump stock restrictions have received support from both major parties and gun rights organizations. This reflects broad agreement that these specific devices pose unnecessary public safety risks.
Some argue bump stock bans restrict citizens' rights to bear arms and modify lawfully-owned weapons. Legal challenges may claim the restriction overreaches constitutional protections for firearm ownership.
Defining and distinguishing bump stocks from legal rapid-fire shooting techniques may create enforcement difficulties. Manufacturers could design similar devices with slightly different mechanisms to circumvent the ban.
Bump stocks represent a small fraction of firearms in circulation. Critics question whether banning this specific device significantly reduces overall gun violence when most shootings involve standard firearms.
Manufacturers, retailers, and owners with existing bump stock inventories face financial losses. The ban eliminates a legal market segment without compensation for affected businesses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.