Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 402.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill addresses organized retail theft by creating new federal crime enforcement tools and penalties.
The problem
Organized groups steal merchandise from stores in coordinated ways, causing significant losses to retailers and affecting product availability and prices for consumers.
The proposal
Creates federal penalties for organized retail theft rings, improves data sharing between law enforcement and retailers, and provides funding for anti-theft initiatives.
The impact
Retailers gain enforcement support; law enforcement gets new tools; consumers may see reduced theft-related costs; individuals involved in organized theft face stricter penalties.
Gives law enforcement stronger tools to target organized theft groups. This could reduce billions in annual retail losses, potentially lowering prices for consumers and keeping stores profitable.
Organized retail theft often connects to other crimes. Targeting these networks may reduce associated criminal activity and make communities safer.
Increases information sharing between police departments and retailers. Better coordination can make law enforcement more effective against multi-state theft operations.
Small retailers are hit hardest by organized theft. Federal support helps level the playing field against large coordinated criminal operations.
Increased data sharing between retailers and police may track individuals more broadly. Some worry this could enable surveillance beyond preventing theft.
Local police already stretched thin. New federal mandate requires resources and training, potentially diverting attention from other community needs.
Federal penalties for retail theft could catch low-level shoplifters in organized crime charges. This may result in overly harsh sentences for minor offenses.
Funding source for new enforcement initiatives unclear. Taxpayers may bear costs for programs that primarily benefit large retailers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.