Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reauthorizes federal funding and programs for landslide hazard research and preparedness.
The problem
Landslides cause deaths, injuries, and property damage across the United States. Federal programs studying and preparing for landslides need renewed funding and direction.
The proposal
Extends the National Landslide Hazards Mitigation Program, maintains research initiatives, and authorizes federal spending for landslide monitoring and community preparedness.
The impact
State and local governments, scientists, and communities in landslide-prone areas gain continued federal support for safety measures and research.
Continued funding for landslide research helps communities prepare for and prevent disasters. Better prediction systems and warning networks protect residents in at-risk areas.
Reauthorization allows scientists to study landslide patterns and develop better forecasting tools. This research benefits future preparedness efforts nationwide.
States and municipalities receive federal resources for mapping hazards and planning evacuations. This strengthens emergency response at the local level.
Climate change and development increase landslide risks in many areas. Federal coordination tackles a challenge individuals cannot solve alone.
Reauthorizing programs requires government funding. Critics argue this adds to federal spending and national debt.
Most landslides affect specific regions. Communities without landslide risk may question why federal money supports specialized programs.
No official summary provided, making it hard to assess whether current programs achieve measurable results. Reauthorization assumes existing approaches work well.
Questions may arise about whether state and local governments should fund their own landslide preparedness instead of relying on federal programs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 9394
Civil Preparedness for Agroterrorism Exercise Act of 2026
HR 1342
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
HR 10132
ARTICLE ONE Act
HR 10122
STORM FORTIFIED and Wildfire Prepared Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.