Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Unanimous Consent.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Completes transfer of North Dakota trust lands to state control and management.
The problem
North Dakota has incomplete trust lands from original statehood grants. These lands remain under federal management, limiting state authority and resource development.
The proposal
Transfers remaining federal trust lands to North Dakota state ownership. Allows state to manage resources and revenue from these lands.
The impact
North Dakota gains control of land assets and revenue. Federal government reduces land management responsibilities. Tribes, ranchers, and conservationists may be affected by state management policies.
North Dakota can generate income from land sales, leases, and resource extraction. This money can fund schools, infrastructure, and other state priorities. States often have more flexible management than federal agencies.
State government typically makes decisions quicker than federal bureaucracy. Local leaders understand local needs better and can respond faster to opportunities.
Original statehood agreements promised certain lands to North Dakota. Finishing this transfer honors commitments made over a century ago.
Federal government saves money by transferring land management responsibility to the state. This reduces federal spending on administration and upkeep.
Federal lands have strong environmental standards. State management might prioritize resource extraction over conservation. Environmental groups worry about wetlands, wildlife habitat, and water quality.
Some trust lands may overlap with Native American treaty rights or sacred sites. Transfer could limit tribal access or conflict with existing agreements.
Managing more land requires staff and money. If North Dakota cuts corners to save costs, lands could be poorly maintained or over-exploited.
Federal lands often allow public hunting, fishing, and recreation. State ownership might restrict access or charge fees, affecting outdoor enthusiasts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.