Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Transfers California land to the Pechanga Band of Indians to hold in trust.
The problem
The Pechanga Band of Indians seeks federal recognition of land ownership through trust status, which provides legal protections and sovereignty benefits under federal Indian law.
The proposal
The bill places specified California land into federal trust exclusively for the Pechanga Band of Indians, granting them governmental authority over that territory.
The impact
The Pechanga Band gains land ownership and self-governance rights. California loses state jurisdiction over the land. Surrounding communities and other stakeholders may experience changes in local governance.
The bill supports the Pechanga Band's right to self-governance and control over their lands. Trust status provides legal recognition of tribal authority and protects tribal interests under federal law.
Trust land enables tribes to pursue economic projects like gaming, housing, and business development. These activities can generate revenue for tribal services and employment.
The federal government has historical trust responsibilities toward Native American tribes. This bill addresses those obligations by securing land rights for the Pechanga Band.
Trust land allows tribes to maintain cultural practices, traditions, and heritage on their own territory. This supports long-term cultural continuity and community identity.
Trust land is typically exempt from state taxation. California loses property tax revenue and potentially other tax income from the transferred land.
The state loses law enforcement and regulatory authority over the land. This may complicate emergency services, environmental enforcement, and other state functions.
Nearby communities may worry about land use changes, gaming operations, or loss of local control. Property owners and local governments may face uncertainty about future development.
Approval could encourage similar trust requests from other tribes, potentially accelerating land transfers away from state control and creating ongoing jurisdictional disputes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.