Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Clarifies federal jurisdiction over the Shivwits Band of Paiutes tribe and their reservation lands.
The problem
Legal uncertainty exists about which government has authority over the Shivwits Band of Paiutes reservation, creating confusion about law enforcement, tribal rights, and governance responsibilities.
The proposal
The bill establishes clear federal jurisdiction rules for the Shivwits Band of Paiutes, defining how tribal, state, and federal authorities interact on their lands.
The impact
The Shivwits Band of Paiutes gains legal clarity on self-governance. State and federal agencies know their roles. Residents understand which laws apply to them.
Clear jurisdiction strengthens the Shivwits Band's ability to govern themselves and make decisions for their community. This supports tribal sovereignty and independence. The tribe can plan better with certainty.
Defining jurisdiction prevents disputes between tribal, state, and federal authorities. Law enforcement knows who handles crimes. Courts know which system applies. This saves time and legal costs.
Legal clarity helps the tribe attract investment and develop businesses. Companies want certainty about which laws govern contracts. The tribe can plan long-term projects with confidence.
Clear authority helps the tribe provide better police, courts, and services to residents. Everyone knows who to contact for help. Response times may improve.
Utah loses some jurisdiction over the reservation area. State laws may no longer apply there. This could affect state tax revenue and law enforcement. Local officials may object.
The tribe needs funding and staff to run courts, police, and government systems. Establishing these institutions costs money upfront. Ongoing costs may strain limited tribal budgets.
People living on the reservation who are not tribal members must follow tribal law instead of state law. This changes their legal protections and rights. Some may disagree with tribal policies.
Clear jurisdiction helps but does not solve all conflicts. Tribal, state, and federal systems must still cooperate on issues like water rights and border enforcement. Coordination remains complex.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.