Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Prevents students convicted of campus crimes from getting federal student loans.
The problem
Some students convicted of serious crimes on campus still receive federal financial aid. This raises concerns about taxpayer money supporting individuals with criminal records.
The proposal
The bill would deny federal student loans to students convicted of certain crimes committed on college campuses or during school activities.
The impact
Students convicted of campus crimes lose federal loan eligibility. Schools must report convictions. Taxpayers no longer fund loans for these students.
Prevents federal money from funding loans for students with campus crime convictions. This addresses concerns about public funds supporting individuals convicted of crimes.
May deter serious criminal behavior on campuses by creating financial consequences. Shows that criminal actions have lasting impact on educational opportunities.
Connects criminal convictions to educational access. Students facing serious legal consequences also face educational barriers, creating accountability.
Permanently denies educational funding to convicted students, even after serving sentences. This may prevent rehabilitation and future success, limiting long-term opportunities.
Wealthy families can pay tuition without loans; poor families cannot. This creates barriers primarily for low-income students already facing disadvantages.
Bill doesn't specify which crimes qualify or the definition of 'campus crimes.' This vagueness could lead to confusion about who gets excluded.
Schools must track and report convictions, creating administrative burden. Privacy concerns arise around sharing criminal history information.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.