Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Rename a post office in Georgetown, Ohio after President Ulysses S. Grant.
The problem
A federal post office building lacks a name honoring a significant historical figure with local connections.
The proposal
Officially designate the USPS facility at 201 East Grant Avenue in Georgetown, Ohio as the Ulysses S. Grant Post Office Building.
The impact
Postal customers and staff will use a renamed building. The local community gains recognition of historical significance.
Georgetown is President Grant's birthplace. This designation celebrates an important American historical figure with deep community ties. It helps preserve and promote local heritage.
Renaming requires minimal expense—mainly new signage and paperwork. No physical changes to the building or operations are needed.
The designation may increase civic engagement and tourism interest in Georgetown. It recognizes the town's historical importance in American history.
USPS must update signs, documents, and records. Staff must learn the new name for mail and phone communications.
A name change does not improve postal services or solve community problems. The impact on daily operations is minimal.
Congress is spending legislative effort on a symbolic designation rather than major policy issues. Individual bills for post office names consume time.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.