Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates a federal process for temporarily removing guns from people considered dangerous.
The problem
Some people in crisis may pose immediate danger to themselves or others. Current responses vary by state. Federal framework could provide consistent standards.
The proposal
Establishes federal extreme risk protection orders allowing courts to temporarily remove firearms from individuals deemed at imminent risk of harming themselves or others.
The impact
Affects individuals in mental health crises, gun owners, law enforcement, courts, and families concerned about loved ones' safety.
Temporary firearm removal during crisis periods may reduce deaths by suicide, which account for most gun deaths annually. Research suggests access restriction during acute crisis can save lives.
Federal framework provides uniform procedures across states instead of current patchwork system. Clarifies how courts and law enforcement handle dangerous situations.
Federal structure likely includes court oversight and hearing rights for individuals. Balances safety concerns with constitutional protections through judicial review.
Provides law enforcement with clear legal tools and procedures for crisis intervention. Reduces ambiguity about authority and liability in dangerous situations.
Gun rights advocates argue temporary firearm removal without criminal conviction raises constitutional questions. Concerns exist about government authority to restrict rights based on prediction of danger.
Opponents worry process could be weaponized in disputes between family members or acquaintances. Standards for 'extreme risk' may be interpreted too broadly.
Critics question whether current procedures adequately protect individuals facing firearm removal orders. Emergency situations may bypass full hearing rights initially.
Federal program requires funding for courts, law enforcement training, and administrative infrastructure. Burden on state and local systems not fully funded federally.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.