Latest action: Committee on Indian Affairs. Ordered to be reported without amendment favorably.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Allows Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Aquinnah tribes to lease land for up to 99 years.
The problem
Current law limits leases to shorter terms, restricting tribes' ability to develop land and secure long-term revenue for economic development and self-governance.
The proposal
Amends the 1955 Long-Term Leasing Act to permit up to 99-year leases on tribal reservation lands and trust lands, extending from current limits.
The impact
Mashpee Wampanoag and Wampanoag Aquinnah tribes gain flexibility for development projects and revenue generation. Non-tribal entities seeking land leases could benefit from extended agreements.
Longer leases enable tribes to attract business partners and investors needing multi-decade commitments for large projects. This can generate sustained revenue for tribal governments to fund schools, healthcare, and services.
Extended lease authority gives tribes greater control over their lands and resources. This supports tribal sovereignty and ability to pursue self-determination priorities.
99-year terms provide long-term stability for businesses making significant infrastructure investments on leased land. This encourages commitment and planning.
Success with these two tribes may establish a model other tribes could request, expanding tribal economic opportunities more broadly.
99-year leases mean tribes give up control of significant land portions for a century. This reduces flexibility to redirect land use for future tribal priorities or needs.
Long-term leases could lock in land use patterns difficult to change if environmental protection becomes a priority later. Lessees may resist modifications even if needed.
Powerful companies may pressure tribes to accept unfavorable lease terms for extended periods, knowing they have outsized leverage in negotiations.
Long-term fixed lease rates may not adjust for inflation or changing economic conditions, potentially reducing tribes' real income over 99 years.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.