Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Expands patient access to medical records and health information documentation.
The problem
Patients often face delays and obstacles obtaining their own medical records from doctors and hospitals, limiting their ability to manage health care decisions and seek second opinions.
The proposal
Requires healthcare providers to give patients faster, easier access to electronic health records and medical documentation in digital formats at minimal or no cost.
The impact
Patients gain quicker access to their medical information. Healthcare providers may face new compliance costs and administrative burdens managing record requests.
Patients can access their own medical records quickly and easily. This helps them make better health decisions and coordinate care across multiple doctors. Greater access supports patient autonomy and informed healthcare choices.
Patients with easy access to their records can share information between providers more efficiently. This reduces duplicate tests and improves communication among healthcare teams. Better coordination can lead to faster diagnoses and better outcomes.
Patients already own their medical information legally. This bill strengthens that right by requiring timely, affordable access. Stronger consumer protections align with modern digital expectations for personal data access.
Standardized digital access requirements can streamline the record-request process. Clear timelines and formats reduce back-and-forth confusion. Patients spend less time navigating bureaucratic obstacles.
Healthcare providers may need to update software systems and train staff to comply with new access requirements. Small clinics with limited budgets could face significant expenses. These costs might ultimately be passed to patients through higher fees.
Increased digital access to sensitive health records could expand opportunities for data breaches and unauthorized access. Implementation details matter greatly for protecting patient privacy. Healthcare systems may struggle with cybersecurity demands.
Healthcare staff must spend time processing and sending records rather than providing patient care. High-volume requests could overwhelm small practices. Administrative workload increases without corresponding resources or staffing.
The bill summary lacks detail about timelines, fees, penalties, and technical standards. Without clear rules, providers and patients may face confusion. Inconsistent implementation across states and organizations is possible.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.