Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 529.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Warren Davidson (R-OH)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Updates the Data Protection Act to modernize federal privacy and security rules.
The problem
Current data protection laws are outdated. They don't address new technology challenges, cybersecurity threats, or how companies use personal information today.
The proposal
The bill modernizes the Data Protection Act with updated privacy standards, stronger security requirements, and new rules for how organizations handle personal data.
The impact
Government agencies, private companies, and individuals who use digital services will face new data handling requirements and stronger privacy protections.
Citizens get stronger rules protecting their personal information from misuse. Companies must follow clearer standards for collecting and storing data. This reduces unauthorized access and data breaches.
The bill updates cybersecurity requirements to match current threats. Organizations must use modern protection methods. This helps prevent hacking and data theft in an increasingly digital world.
Updated federal standards replace confusing state-by-state rules. Companies know what's required nationwide. This reduces confusion about compliance requirements.
Stronger protections may increase public trust in digital services. People feel safer sharing information online when privacy rules are clear and enforced. This can boost economic activity.
Businesses must spend money upgrading systems and staff training to meet new rules. Small companies may struggle more than large ones. Costs could be passed to consumers through higher prices.
Strict rules might limit how companies use data for legitimate purposes like research or fraud prevention. Overly broad restrictions could reduce beneficial services and innovation.
Government agencies need resources to enforce new rules fairly across industries. Without proper funding, enforcement may be uneven or slow. Some violators might avoid penalties.
Strict regulations might discourage companies from developing new data-driven products and services. Entrepreneurs could avoid privacy-sensitive business areas due to regulatory burden.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.