Latest action: Became Public Law No: 119-93.
Signed into law by the President (or passed over a veto). Now public law.
The President signed the bill into law (or Congress overrode a veto). It's now public law and federal agencies will implement it.
Finalizes land rights and entitlements for the Cape Fox tribe in Alaska.
The problem
The Cape Fox tribe seeks resolution of outstanding land claims and entitlements that have remained unresolved, affecting the tribe's sovereignty and resource access.
The proposal
The bill grants the Cape Fox tribe finalized land entitlements and establishes their land rights in accordance with applicable federal law and prior agreements.
The impact
Cape Fox tribe members gain clarified land ownership and control. Alaska stakeholders and federal agencies must adjust to new land designations and tribal jurisdiction.
Strengthens Cape Fox tribe's self-governance and control over their lands. Enables the tribe to make decisions about resource management and development. Recognizes tribal authority over ancestral territories.
Provides the Cape Fox tribe with land-based economic opportunities through development and resource management. May enable job creation and revenue generation for tribal members. Supports long-term tribal financial stability.
Resolves decades of uncertainty about land status and boundaries. Eliminates ongoing disputes over entitlements. Provides clear legal framework for future tribal planning.
Addresses longstanding land claims rooted in treaty obligations and Native rights. Acknowledges Cape Fox heritage and prior occupation. Fulfills federal commitments to tribal nations.
Creates costs for federal agencies to process and monitor new land designations. May require new administrative infrastructure for joint management. Implementation requires coordination across multiple agencies.
Other stakeholders with existing land use rights may face restrictions or changes. Non-Native businesses or residents could be affected by new tribal jurisdiction. Clarity on transition period and protections needed.
Potential conflicts over resource extraction and environmental protections. May limit or change public access to certain areas. Environmental review processes could be affected.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.