Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires federal agencies to better manage and oversee their software purchases and licenses.
The problem
Federal agencies spend billions on software but lack clear oversight, leading to wasted money, duplicate purchases, and security risks from poorly tracked systems.
The proposal
The bill establishes requirements for agencies to inventory, monitor, and manage their software assets. It creates standards for tracking licenses, reducing waste, and improving security protocols.
The impact
Federal agencies must change how they buy and use software. Taxpayers may benefit from reduced waste. Software companies may face new reporting requirements.
Better tracking of software licenses prevents duplicate purchases and unused subscriptions. Agencies can negotiate better deals when they know what they already own. This reduces government waste.
Tracking all software helps agencies identify outdated or vulnerable programs. Agencies can apply security updates faster and reduce hacking risks. Better oversight catches security problems earlier.
Agencies spend less time searching for software licenses and managing multiple contracts. Clear standards help agencies make faster, smarter purchasing decisions. This frees up time and resources.
Written requirements make agencies responsible for tracking spending. Congress can better review how federal money is spent on technology. Transparency increases government oversight.
Agencies must hire staff or buy systems to track software properly. Initial setup expenses could be significant. Some agencies may struggle with tight budgets.
New rules and requirements slow down how fast agencies can buy needed software. Employees spend time on paperwork instead of their actual jobs. Bureaucracy increases complexity.
New reporting requirements could be expensive for smaller vendors selling to government. Companies might pass costs to agencies. This could reduce competition in government software markets.
The bill does not provide information about penalties or how compliance will be checked. Agencies might not follow rules consistently. Without clear enforcement, requirements may be ignored.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.