Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates standards for how government agencies check and share information quality.
The problem
Government agencies publish information without consistent quality checks. Citizens and businesses need reliable, accurate data from federal sources.
The proposal
Establishes quality assurance standards for government information. Requires agencies to review accuracy, completeness, and usefulness of published data.
The impact
Affects government agencies, citizens using public data, researchers, and businesses relying on federal information accuracy and accessibility.
Clear standards help ensure government data is accurate and useful. Citizens can trust federal information more. Errors and outdated information get caught before release.
Fixing bad data is expensive. Setting quality rules upfront prevents costly mistakes. Businesses make better decisions with reliable government data.
Quality standards make agencies more transparent. People can see how government checks its work. This builds trust in government.
Scientists and companies need good data to do their work. Better government information supports research and new business development.
Agencies need staff and resources to check information quality. This increases government spending. Some agencies may struggle with the cost.
Quality checks take time. Government might release information more slowly. Fast-moving situations could be affected by delays.
The bill details are not available. Agencies might disagree on what counts as quality. Different standards could create confusion.
Large agencies have resources for quality checks. Smaller agencies may struggle to meet new requirements. This could create unfair burdens.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.