Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates legal liability for cities with sanctuary policies regarding crimes by undocumented immigrants.
The problem
Some cities limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Supporters argue this prevents accountability when crimes occur involving undocumented immigrants in these jurisdictions.
The proposal
Establishes legal pathways for victims to sue sanctuary cities for damages related to crimes committed by undocumented immigrants that could have been prevented through immigration enforcement cooperation.
The impact
Affects sanctuary city policies, immigrants, crime victims, local governments, and federal-local law enforcement relationships regarding immigration enforcement.
Supporters argue this creates consequences for sanctuary policies they view as enabling crime. It incentivizes local cooperation with federal immigration enforcement to reduce legal liability.
Provides a legal avenue for victims of crimes to seek damages from cities they believe contributed to their harm through non-cooperation policies.
Proponents contend it encourages alignment between local and federal immigration enforcement priorities, potentially improving public safety coordination.
Legal experts question whether cities can be held liable for crimes committed by individuals when sanctuary policies don't directly cause criminal acts. This raises constitutional questions about proper causation.
Opponents argue sanctuary policies help immigrant communities report crimes without fear of deportation. Reversing this could reduce crime reporting and damage community-police relationships.
Critics contend this inappropriately punishes local governments for policy disagreements with federal immigration enforcement, violating principles of local control.
Cities would face significant legal expenses defending lawsuits, potentially diverting resources from public services regardless of verdict outcomes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.