Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to hold sanctuary cities accountable and support law enforcement affected by immigration policies.
The problem
Some cities limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement. Law enforcement officers have been killed in incidents involving undocumented immigrants. Supporters argue these policies create public safety risks.
The proposal
Bill would create consequences for sanctuary city policies and provide support for families of law enforcement officers killed by undocumented immigrants.
The impact
Sanctuary cities, immigration enforcement agencies, law enforcement families, and undocumented immigrant communities would be affected by changed cooperation policies and potential funding changes.
The bill provides assistance to families of officers killed in line of duty. This recognizes the sacrifices made by law enforcement. It offers financial support during difficult times.
Requiring cities to work with federal immigration authorities could improve information sharing. This may help identify individuals wanted for crimes. Supporters argue it enhances public safety coordination.
The bill clarifies that sanctuary city policies conflict with federal immigration law. It establishes federal government power over immigration enforcement. This reduces legal ambiguity.
Cities argue they should decide how to use their own police resources. Forcing cooperation with federal immigration enforcement limits local control. This creates tension between state and federal government power.
Police say immigrants won't report crimes if they fear deportation. Reduced reporting may actually hurt public safety efforts. Communities become less safe when people distrust law enforcement.
Sanctuary city policies affect cities unequally based on existing rules. Punishing some cities more than others raises fairness questions. Different enforcement could burden specific communities unfairly.
Forcing local police to enforce federal immigration law requires training and resources. Cities may face significant costs for additional responsibilities. Small cities could struggle with new requirements.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.