Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requiring crime data collection and reporting to reduce crime.
The problem
Limited crime data collection makes it hard to understand crime patterns and develop effective law enforcement strategies.
The proposal
Establishes requirements for counting, tracking, and reporting crime statistics to improve data collection nationwide.
The impact
Law enforcement agencies must gather more data; policymakers get better crime information; communities may see more targeted policing.
Improved data helps police and officials understand where crime happens and what types are most common. This information can guide smarter decisions about where to focus resources and what strategies work best.
Lawmakers can make decisions based on real facts instead of guesses. Better data means laws and enforcement strategies are more likely to actually reduce crime.
Citizens can see accurate crime statistics in their communities. This allows communities to hold officials accountable and understand public safety issues better.
Police departments can identify problem areas and allocate officers and funding more effectively. This can reduce wasted resources on less effective strategies.
Police and law enforcement agencies must invest time and money in new data collection systems. Small departments may struggle with costs of upgrading technology and training staff.
Collecting more crime data raises questions about citizen privacy and how information gets used. Communities may worry about surveillance or biased data collection and use.
Different police departments use different systems and standards. Getting everyone to report data the same way is difficult and expensive. Some departments may not have resources to comply quickly.
Crime statistics can be manipulated or misinterpreted by officials seeking to show positive results. Communities might be targeted unfairly based on incomplete or biased data.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.