Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows motorcycles on certain federal public lands where they are currently prohibited.
The problem
Motorcyclists cannot access some federal lands and trails. Supporters say current rules unfairly restrict motorcycle recreation on public property.
The proposal
Changes federal rules to permit motorcycles on specific public lands managed by the government, possibly expanding where riders can legally travel.
The impact
Motorcyclists gain access to federal lands. Land managers, hikers, and environmental groups face new regulations. Local communities near public lands experience increased activity.
Motorcyclists would access more federal trails and lands for recreation. This treats motorcycle enthusiasts more fairly compared to other outdoor users. Millions of Americans ride motorcycles recreationally.
Increased outdoor recreation can boost spending at local businesses near public lands. Fuel, food, lodging, and gear purchases benefit rural communities. Tourism revenue could grow in areas with federal lands.
Opens public lands to more citizens for exercise and nature enjoyment. Encourages people to visit federal parks and forests. Increases public engagement with natural spaces.
Motorcycles are already allowed on some federal lands. Expanding access treats all recreation types more equally. Removes restrictions some view as discriminatory toward one group.
Motorcycles cause soil erosion, damage vegetation, and disrupt wildlife habitats. Off-road vehicles can harm sensitive ecosystems and water quality. Repeated trail use creates lasting environmental impacts.
Hikers, campers, and peaceful nature visitors may face noise and safety concerns. Motorcycle noise disrupts quiet outdoor experiences. Different recreation types may not coexist well on same trails.
Federal agencies need more staff to monitor new motorcycle areas and enforce rules. Trail maintenance increases with heavier vehicle use. Taxpayers may face higher costs for land management.
Motorcycles introduce noise and mechanical activity into natural areas. Some public lands are designated to preserve undisturbed wilderness. Motorized access conflicts with preservation goals for certain areas.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.