Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding for childcare services at college campuses.
The problem
College students with children struggle to afford childcare, making education harder. Federal funding for campus childcare programs needs renewal.
The proposal
The bill extends and reauthorizes the Child Care Access Means Parents In School program, which provides federal grants to colleges for onsite childcare services.
The impact
Student parents gain access to affordable childcare at college campuses. Colleges receive federal funding to operate or improve childcare facilities.
Affordable campus childcare removes a major barrier for parents pursuing college degrees. This allows more adults to complete education and increase earning potential. Student parents can focus on studies instead of childcare stress.
More educated parents benefit the job market with skilled workers. Colleges can retain students who might otherwise drop out. This improves economic competitiveness.
Student parents are often low-income and cannot afford private childcare. Federal funding directly helps disadvantaged families access education opportunities. This promotes economic mobility.
On-campus childcare is typically cheaper than private providers. This eases financial burden on struggling student families. More affordable options increase education access.
Reauthorizing this program requires federal spending that adds to budget deficits. The government must find money from other areas or raise taxes. Long-term costs could strain federal finances.
Not all colleges can or will participate in the program. Rural and smaller colleges may struggle to build childcare facilities. Benefits may go mainly to universities in wealthy areas.
Better-funded colleges may provide superior childcare services. This creates advantages for students at richer universities. Equity gaps could worsen between institutions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.