Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Senate bill to improve voting access and election administration procedures.
The problem
Voting systems and election administration vary widely across states, creating inconsistencies in how elections are conducted and potential barriers to voter participation.
The proposal
Establishes standards for election administration, voting access, and voter registration procedures across states to create more uniform election processes.
The impact
Voters, election officials, and states are affected through changes to voting procedures, registration systems, and election management practices.
Standardized procedures could make voting easier for citizens across different states. Consistent rules might reduce confusion about where, when, and how to vote. Early voting and registration options may increase participation.
Uniform standards could strengthen election integrity and security measures nationwide. Consistent verification procedures may reduce fraud risks. Better coordination among states improves election reliability.
Standardized procedures reduce costs and confusion for election officials. Uniform systems simplify staff training and voter education. Consistent processes make elections run more smoothly.
Federal standards limit states' ability to run elections as their communities prefer. States may resist losing control over voting procedures and rules. Local election management traditions could be disrupted.
States and counties need funding to update voting systems and procedures. Training staff and voters on new rules requires resources. Some smaller jurisdictions may struggle with compliance expenses.
Different states have different geographic and demographic needs that universal rules may not address. Rural and urban areas may face different challenges. Uniform policies might not work equally well everywhere.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.