Latest action: Held at the desk.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The Senate voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the House, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Allocates more federal money to restore the San Joaquin River in California.
The problem
The San Joaquin River Restoration Settlement requires ongoing funding to implement restoration projects. Additional money is needed to continue the work authorized under the settlement agreement.
The proposal
This bill provides extra federal funding specifically for San Joaquin River restoration activities as outlined in the existing settlement act.
The impact
California communities, farmers, and ecosystems benefit from restored river conditions. Taxpayers fund the project. Local water management and agricultural operations are affected.
Restoring the San Joaquin River helps fish populations, wildlife habitat, and natural ecosystems recover. This improves water quality and supports biodiversity in the region.
The settlement agreement requires restoration work. Additional funding ensures the government meets its legal commitments and maintains credibility in environmental agreements.
River restoration can improve water conditions for local communities and agricultural areas. Better river management supports long-term water sustainability in California.
Restoration projects create jobs for construction workers, engineers, and environmental specialists in the region.
Additional federal funding increases government spending and adds to the national budget. This money comes from taxpayers and could be used for other priorities.
River restoration projects can face unexpected expenses and delays. The full long-term cost and timeline for completion remain unclear.
Some farmers worry restoration efforts may affect water availability or access for agricultural irrigation. Changes to river management could impact farming operations.
Restoring a large river is complex and requires coordination between multiple agencies and stakeholders. Execution delays and conflicts could slow progress.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.