Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Requires online transparency and accountability for federal post-disaster assistance programs.
The problem
Federal disaster aid programs lack consistent public transparency. Citizens and officials struggle to track how disaster relief money is spent and distributed across different agencies.
The proposal
Establishes online systems to publicly report post-disaster assistance data. Requires federal agencies to share spending information, recipient details, and program outcomes on accessible government websites.
The impact
Affects federal agencies managing disaster aid, state/local governments receiving funds, disaster survivors, and taxpayers monitoring relief spending.
Citizens can see how federal disaster money is spent. This helps hold government accountable and builds public trust in relief programs.
Public access to assistance data makes it easier to spot misuse of funds. Transparency deters improper spending and helps investigators identify problems.
Agencies can share data online to coordinate better. Officials understand what aid exists and avoid duplicating efforts across programs.
Taxpayers funding disaster relief can track where their money goes. This enables citizens to engage in informed public debate about spending priorities.
Building and maintaining new online systems requires money and IT staff. Agencies may need to hire expertise or upgrade outdated technology.
Publishing disaster assistance data online could expose personal information about vulnerable survivors. Privacy protections must be carefully designed to avoid harm.
Multiple federal agencies must coordinate data collection and reporting. This adds administrative work during emergencies when agencies are already overwhelmed.
Centralized public databases could attract hackers targeting government systems. Protecting sensitive financial information requires robust cybersecurity measures.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 9394
Civil Preparedness for Agroterrorism Exercise Act of 2026
HR 1342
Stopping Political Discrimination in Disaster Assistance Act
HR 10132
ARTICLE ONE Act
HR 10122
STORM FORTIFIED and Wildfire Prepared Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.